Azure Virtual Machines – Consider Upgrading F-Series Machines to Fsv2

Azure Virtual Machines – Consider Upgrading F-Series Machines to Fsv2

When managing Azure Virtual Machines, upgrading from F-series to Fsv2-series can provide significant cost savings and performance improvements. This policy recommends transitioning to newer Fsv2 instances to optimize your cloud infrastructure spending.

Why This Policy Matters

The Fsv2-series offers substantial benefits over the original F-series:

  • Cost Efficiency: Up to 14% lower monthly costs

  • Performance Upgrade: Newer processor architecture

  • Consistent Specifications: Similar core and memory configurations

Detailed Cost Analysis

Comparative Cost Example

Standard_F2 instance:

2 vCPUs

4 GB RAM

Monthly cost: $72.27 (East US region)

Standard_F2s_v2 instance:

2 vCPUs

4 GB RAM

Monthly cost: $61.76

Savings: $10.51 (14% reduction)

Implementation Guide

Infrastructure as Code Transformation Example (Terraform)

Before (Outdated F-Series)

resource "azurerm_virtual_machine" "example" {

vm_size = "Standard_F2"

# Other configuration parameters

}

After (Upgraded Fsv2-Series)

resource "azurerm_virtual_machine" "example" {

vm_size = "Standard_F2s_v2"

# Other configuration parameters

}

Manual Migration Steps

  • Assess Current Infrastructure

  • Inventory all F series virtual machines

  • Verify compatibility with Fsv2 series

Plan Migration

Schedule maintenance window

Backup existing virtual machines

Test Fsv2 compatibility

Execute Migration

Stop current virtual machine

Change VM size to corresponding Fsv2 series

Restart virtual machine

Best Practices

  • Gradual Transition: Migrate machines in phases

  • Performance Testing: Validate application performance after migration

  • Cost Monitoring: Track actual savings post-migration

Recommended Tools

  • Infracost: Automatically detect and suggest F to Fsv2 series upgrades

  • Azure Cost Management: Track and validate cost savings

  • Azure Advisor: Provides additional rightsizing recommendations

Practical Examples

Scenario 1: Development Environment

Current Setup: 10 Standard_F2 machines

Potential Monthly Savings: $105.10

Annual Impact: Approximately $1,261.20 saved

Scenario 2: Production Workload

Current Setup: 50 Standard_F4 machines

Potential Monthly Savings: $2,525.50

Annual Impact: Approximately $30,306 saved

Considerations and Caveats

Potential Limitations

  • Some legacy applications might require specific testing

  • Minor configuration adjustments might be necessary

  • Temporary service interruption during migration

When to Avoid

  • Highly specialized workloads with strict compatibility requirements

  • Machines with complex custom configurations

  • Environments with immediate performance-critical constraints

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How difficult is the migration process?

The migration is typically straightforward, involving a simple VM size change and restart.

Are there performance differences between F and Fsv2 series?

Fsv2 series offers improved processor performance with similar core/memory configurations.

Can Infracost help me identify these upgrade opportunities?

Yes, Infracost includes automated detection of cost optimization opportunities like F to Fsv2 series upgrades.

What if my specific VM configuration isn’t directly mappable?

Consult Azure documentation for precise equivalent configurations or contact Azure support.

How quickly can I realize cost savings?

Cost savings are immediate upon successful migration and VM restart.

Create Free Account

This policy is supported in Infracost and available in the free trial. Sign up today and scan your code using our entire library of FinOps policies.

Get started
with Infracost

© 2026 Infracost Inc

Manage cookies

Get started
with Infracost

© 2026 Infracost Inc

Manage cookies

Get started
with Infracost

© 2026 Infracost Inc

Manage cookies